order lasix
get lasix
purchase diflucan
lasix uk
purchase zithromax
diflucan prescription
purchase zithromax
lasix no prescription
diflucan uk
zithromax canada
purchase lasix
buy diflucan
where zithromax
zithromax online
buy diflucan
zithromax online
cheap diflucan
purchase diflucan
zithromax no prescription

buy zithromax
zithromax no rx
get lasix
purchase diflucan
order diflucan
buy zithromax
where zithromax
order lasix
lasix online
get zithromax
diflucan online
order lasix
buy lasix
cheap zithromax
diflucan buy
buy zithromax
zithromax uk
where diflucan
diflucan online
diflucan online
purchase lasix
lasix canada
cheap zithromax

purchase zithromax
buy diflucan
purchase lasix
lasix online
zithromax online
diflucan cheap
purchase zithromax
buy diflucan
get diflucan
diflucan uk
cheap lasix
zithromax uk
purchase zithromax
purchase lasix
lasix no rx
diflucan cheap
order diflucan
cheap lasix
buy diflucan
zithromax online
buy diflucan
buy diflucan
diflucan uk
lasix online
zithromax buy
lasix canada
get lasix
buy lasix
zithromax prescription
purchase lasix
diflucan no rx
zithromax prescription
lasix online
zithromax online
lasix uk
get lasix
buy diflucan
buy zithromax
cheap zithromax
diflucan canada
zithromax no prescription
zithromax buy
diflucan canada
lasix online
cheap diflucan
buy zithromax
cheap diflucan
purchase lasix
where zithromax
buy lasix
lasix canada
get diflucan
order diflucan
zithromax prescription
purchase diflucan
zithromax prescription
purchase lasix
buy zithromax
buy diflucan
lasix uk
diflucan online
get diflucan
zithromax online
order lasix
lasix canada
lasix prescription
diflucan online
lasix buy
order lasix
purchase zithromax
zithromax no prescription
zithromax online
purchase lasix
lasix uk
cheap lasix
order zithromax
where diflucan
diflucan online

i’m a chordata! urochordata!

July 1, 2009

Mapping the Sasquatch

Filed under: research, silly — Tags: , — jebyrnes @ 3:45 pm

ResearchBlogging.orgI love modeling! I love modeling! Modeling will solve everything!

Let’s model the spatial distribution of Bigfoot!

WAIT, WHAT?!

Figure 1 from the paper. Foots denote sighting of Sasquatch footprints. Circles for just visual/auditory sightings. I ask, how does one know what Bigfoot sounds like?

Yes, it sounds silly, but in the current issue of the Journal of Biogegraphy, Lozier et al give us their stunning contribution Predicting the distribution of Sasquatch in western North America: anything goes with ecological niche modelling. Finally, all will be revealed. And for those wondering:

Sasquatch belongs to a large primate lineage descended from the extinct Asian species Gigantopithicus blacki, but see Milinkovich et al. (2004) and Coltman & Davis (2005) for phylogenetic analyses indicating possible membership in the ungulate clade.

They do this to prove a point – that Ecological Niche Models for determining species ranges are amazing – invaluable conservation tools, really. But if the taxonomy on the data that goes into them are shoddy (like, say, calling a Black Bear a Sasquatch), the results will be, well, interesting.

They use data on sightings (see Fig. 1 above) from… the Bigfoot Field Research Organization
and then used the latest and greatest in Ecological Niche Modeling to determine, given environmental parameters, just where does Bigfoot live? And, under current climate change scenarios, where might we find Sasquatch in the future?

So cryptozoologists take note! Here is a veritable treasure trove of information as to where to place your next tripwire camera!


Where will bigfoot be in the future after climate change? Panel A shows current Sasquatch Distribution. Panel B shows its projected distribution under climate change.

In fairness, the authors use this dubious analysis to point out that, when we have a record of species occurrences that seem tidy and orderly, we often don’t question their taxonomic validity. The output of these models, vital to some conservation efforts, will only be as good as their input. Indeed, in this case, the authors find striking overlap with the (far less frequently observed) Black Bear (yes, people report sightings of Sasquatch more than that of Black Bears). It’s a real problem, and the assessment of data uncertainty is a real pressing issue for any method that attempts to draw inference from sparse data.

But, really, in the end, this is an Ig-Nobel award winner in the making. Bravo.

Lozier, J., Aniello, P., & Hickerson, M. (2009). Predicting the distribution of Sasquatch in western North America: anything goes with ecological niche modelling Journal of Biogeography DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02152.x

4 Comments »

  1. Brings me in mind of a similar article from the seventies:

    SHELDON, R. & KERR, S., 1972. POPULATION-DENSITY OF MONSTERS IN LOCH-NESS. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 17(5), 796-798.

    I think the principles are the same: the model might be sound, but it all comes down to the input….

    Comment by Hege Folkestad — July 2, 2009 @ 2:22 am

  2. Also, Hurlburt has an article on the spatial distribution of montane unicorns….

    Comment by Raphael — July 2, 2009 @ 9:24 am

  3. Haha, you should nominate us for the ignoble! I think there’s a ling at the JIR website. Thanks for the post, and for actually filtering out the true point of the paper.
    JL

    Comment by ihateaphids — July 2, 2009 @ 11:52 am

  4. Loch-Ness: The pdf of the article can be found over at LnO, and it appears to be free!

    Unicorns: Sadly, this is behind the paywall at JSTOR. But, for those with access, you can find it here.

    Nominations: Done and done! Good luck!

    Comment by jebyrnes — July 3, 2009 @ 5:47 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Security Code:

Powered by WordPress